What is LTV CAC Ratio?

The LTV to CAC ratio, or Customer Lifetime Value to Customer Acquisition Cost ratio, measures the relationship between the expected lifetime value of a customer and the cost of acquiring that customer. This ratio provides insights into the efficiency and sustainability of a company’s customer acquisition efforts.

The LTV to CAC ratio is a valuable metric for assessing the effectiveness of customer acquisition strategies, including sales, marketing, public relations, upselling, and customer programs. Companies aim to have a healthy ratio that demonstrates they are acquiring and maintaining customers.

What is the LTV / CAC Formula?

The formula for calculating the LTV to CAC ratio is very simple: 

LTV to CAC Ratio = Customer Lifetime Value / Customer Acquisition Cost

The final would be expressed as a ratio of the final value to 1 (e.g. 3:1).

LTV / CAC Calculation: Example

A SaaS company, that provides customer support services, has a healthy and growing client base. This company has calculated that the average customer generates $40,000 in revenue over their lifetime with its service. The total cost of acquiring new customers, including marketing, advertising, and sales expenses, for a specific period is $10,000.

Customer Lifetime Value
Customer Acquisition Cost

Using the formula from the previous section and the chart above, we can calculate the LTV to CAC ratio:

LTV to CAC Ratio = 40,000 / 10,000

LTV to CAC Ratio = 4

In this example, the LTV to CAC ratio is 4:1. This means that, on average, for every dollar spent on customer acquisition, the company expects to generate 4x more revenue during the customer’s lifetime.

What is a Good LTV to CAC Ratio?

The ideal LTV to CAC ratio can vary depending on several factors, including a company’s industry, business model, growth stage, and specific business objectives. While there isn’t a universally “good” LTV to CAC ratio that applies to all companies, there are some general guidelines to consider:

Ratio Greater Than 1: In most cases, a company wants the LTV to CAC ratio to be greater than 1. This indicates that, on average, the expected lifetime value of a customer is higher than the cost of acquiring that customer. In other words, the revenue generated from customers is expected to exceed the acquisition costs.

Profitability: A higher ratio (e.g., 3:1 or 4:1) suggests strong profitability in customer acquisition. This means that for every dollar spent on acquiring customers, you expect to generate several dollars in lifetime value.

Industry Benchmarks: A company should compare a ratio to industry benchmarks and norms. Different industries and business models may have varying expectations. SaaS companies, for example, might aim for LTV to CAC ratios between 3:1 and 5:1 or higher.

Business Stage: A company’s stage of growth can influence the desired ratio. Early-stage startups may have lower LTV to CAC ratios as they focus on rapid customer acquisition, while more mature companies may aim for higher ratios to maximize profitability.

Customer Segmentation: Consider variations in the ratio across different customer segments. High-value enterprise customers may have higher acquisition costs but also higher lifetime values, leading to different LTV to CAC ratios for each segment.

Retention and Upsell: High retention rates and the potential for upsells and cross-sells can influence the LTV to CAC ratio positively. Customers who stay longer and purchase more over time contribute more to lifetime value.

Customer Churn: Be mindful of customer churn rates, as high churn can erode the benefits of a high LTV to CAC ratio.

Ultimately, what constitutes a “good” LTV to CAC ratio will depend on a company’s specific business context and goals. It’s essential to monitor this ratio over time, track it for different customer segments, and use it as a guide for optimizing customer acquisition strategies. A healthy LTV to CAC ratio is an indicator of efficient customer acquisition and strong potential for long-term profitability.

Can the LTV to CAC Ratio Be Too High?

In most cases, having a high LTV to CAC ratio is considered a positive indicator for a business. However, it is possible for the LTV to CAC ratio to be “too high” in certain situations, and this can be a cause for concern. Here are some scenarios where an extremely high LTV to CAC ratio might not be ideal:

Over-Optimization for Short-Term Gains: An excessively high ratio may indicate that a company is heavily focused on minimizing acquisition costs without considering the long-term health of the customer relationships. This can lead to strategies that prioritize short-term profitability over customer satisfaction and retention.

Misallocation of Resources: A very high LTV to CAC ratio could suggest that the company is underinvesting in customer acquisition efforts. While profitability is important, it’s also essential to invest in acquiring new customers to fuel growth, especially in competitive markets.

Underinvestment in Product/Service Development: If a company allocates all available resources to minimizing acquisition costs and maximizing profitability, it may neglect investments in product development, customer support, and other areas that contribute to long-term customer satisfaction.

Risk of Overlooking Growth Opportunities: Extremely high LTV to CAC ratios might indicate that the company is not taking advantage of opportunities for upselling, cross-selling, or expanding into new markets. This can limit the company’s growth potential.

Churning High-Value Customers: In some cases, companies may acquire high-value customers at a low cost but then fail to meet their expectations, leading to customer churn. While the ratio remains high, it doesn’t reflect the lost revenue from churned high-value customers.

Limited Market Penetration: An extremely high ratio could suggest that the company is serving a limited portion of its target market. This may be a sign of untapped growth potential that the company is not pursuing.

Can't find the right definition?

We can help.
A SaaS Company’s Revenue Management Journey – From Start-up to Enterprise